alternative amazon bandwidth cheap consists download dreamhost entering expensive faq fast february few file files forsee geared godaddy goign greetings hosting inexpensive issues john lot lots month opposite post project public relatively resource secure selling service solution storage unlike upload url

Greetings --

Anyone using e-junkie with Amazon's S3 storage solution? I've got a download project that I will post in February that consists of only a few files but they are very large. E-junkie's own file hosting service is more geared towards the opposite -- lots of small files.

I've read the FAQ and understand it would be $18/month to use e-junkie with another storage solution, but would it work with S3?

Or, if not, anyone have a good alternative? Fast, secure and relatively inexpensive?


Best--
john.

If you make the resource you upload on S3 public, I don't forsee any issues .. after all what you are entering will be just a URL.

If you goign to be selling a lot, then s3 can be expensive as bandwidth is not cheap there .. unlike Dreamhost or Godaddy where you can get a whole lot for $5/month.