http://www.e-junkie.com/bb/ E-Junkie Forum RSS en-us Copyright 2012, 19.5 Degrees. All rights reserved. webmaster@e-junkie.com webmaster@e-junkie.com Thu, 5 Jun 2008 01:20:33 GMT Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:04:13 GMT 681 E-JUNKIE 5 http://www.e-junkie.com/bb/ http://www.e-junkie.com/ej/logo.gif 290 104 http://www.e-junkie.com/bb/topic/2653/pg/0#post6800 http://www.e-junkie.com/bb/topic/2653/pg/0#post6800 Thu, 5 Jun 2008 01:20:33 GMT
At present, our system is only smart enough to consolidate different products into the larger product's container when the Tube package type is used (as for posters) -- if you order large posters in a large tube along with smaller posters, the system will consolidate the smaller posters into the large tube. Since that configuration is done "behind the curtain" (buyers don't see which package type you are using), I don't think there's any reason you couldn't configure your boxed-shipment products with the "tube" container type, so ordering a larger product would then allow smaller products to be consolidated into the same large package container, even though you're actually shipping in boxes.]]> E-junkie Discussions; E-junkieGuru http://www.e-junkie.com/bb/topic/2653/pg/0#post6800 http://www.e-junkie.com/bb/topic/2653/pg/0#post6800 Wed, 4 Jun 2008 19:56:19 GMT
Say somebody orders two items. The shipping selections for both of these are "small box" with capacity of one. Does the shipping calculator assume that these will be shipped separately, or is it capable of recognizing that we will ship these items together in a larger box?

Should I just select a box with larger capacity for these items so that if more than one is ordered they get charged for only one package being shipped?]]> E-junkie Discussions; adbruce